A CGI ‘PEANUTS’ MOVIE? GOOD GRIEF

1
Posted October 9, 2012 by Jeff Carter in News
Peanuts-Group-2-copyform__long_image

Schulz & Peanuts, The biography of Charles Schulz by David Michaelis, is hands down one of the best books I’ve ever read. It also changed the way I viewed Peanuts forever. Schulz was a great man, a ridiculously hard and dedicated worker who often had Peanuts strips ready six months in advance, but he was also really, really depressed, haunted by a traumatic past, neglectful of  his children, and he cheated on his wife a couple of times. Wait — where was I going with this? Oh yeah, right, a new CG Peanuts movie.

Apparently, Blue Sky Animation, the studio that keeps farting out Ice Age sequels, has secured the rights to produce and release a CG-animated Peanuts feature film in 2015, from a screenplay by Schulz’s son. It will be the first theatrical Peanuts film since 1980′s Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown (And Don’t Come Back!), where the gang went to Europe.

I’m having an extremely hard time wrapping my brain around what a 3D, CG-animated model of a Peanuts character would look like. Charlie Brown’s three-dimensional little bald head seems like it could be the stuff of nightmare fuel when it’s rendered and on-screen. I know that keeping these characters alive and flourishing within the modern cultural vernacular is a good idea, but this whole CG-animated concept just sounds too creepy for words, and I know I can’t be alone in that sentiment. What say you, Leaguers?


About the Author

Jeff Carter
Jeff Carter

Jeff is the defining voice of his generation. Sadly, that generation exists only in an alternate dimension where George Lucas became supreme overlord of the Earth in 1979 and replaced every television broadcast and theatrical film on the planet with Star Wars and Godzilla movies. In this dimension, he’s just a guy from New England who likes writing snarky things about superheroes, monsters, and robots.

  • electreffect

    Unfortunately, bad CGI isn’t the only thing wrong with kid’s movies these days. Do you think there is a single adult who would have enjoyed Alvin & the Chipmunks 2: The Squeakuel any more if it was done with traditional 2D animation? Bad scripts that talk down to kids and character design that lacks any sense of style or taste of the originals. They’re the real culprits. If 2D Smurfs were dancing to Funky Cold Medina would you hate them any less?
    What we’ll probably end up with is CGI Charlie Brown walking around non-CGI Manhattan trying to make sense of the “Real World”. And Snoopy and Woodstock dancing around to Funky Cold Medina.